GW Bush

Bush is World"s #1 Terrorist

Saturday, March 12, 2005

So Much for the New Bush Economy

Bloglines | My Feeds
Turning Chinese
So Much for the New Bush Economy

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

The February payroll jobs figures released last Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics show a continuation of America's descent into a third world service economy.

The Bush administration cheered the creation of 229,000 private sector jobs (which still leaves Bush with a net private sector job loss during his reign). However, once we look at the details, the joy vanishes: 174,000 of the jobs, or 76% of the total, are in nontradable services.

Administrative and waste services (largely temporary help and employment services) account for 61,000 or 35% of the new service jobs. The remainder are accounted for by construction (30,000), retail trade (30,000), healthcare and social assistance (27,000), and waitresses and bar tenders (27,000).

The US has apparently lost the ability to create high productivity, high value-added jobs in tradable goods and services. The ladders of upward mobility are being dismantled by offshore production for home markets and outsourcing of knowledge jobs.

The BLS reports that the number of employed US technical workers has fallen by 221,000 in six major computer and engineering job classifications during 2000-2004. The largest drops were suffered by computer programmers, followed by electrical and electronics engineers, computer scientists and systems analysts.

So much for the new economy that economists promised would take the place of the lost manufacturing economy.

America's remaining job market is domestic nontradable services. While India and China develop first world job markets, the US labor market takes on the characteristics of a third world work force. Only jobs that cannot be outsourced are growing.

The Bush economy has seen a loss of 2.8 million manufacturing jobs, a rise in the unemployment rate of 1.2 percentage points, and a stagnation in real weekly earnings.

How bad will things have to get before economists realize that outsourced jobs are not being replaced? Indeed, many American companies are ceasing to have any presence in the US except for a sales force.

Cisco's CEO, John Chambers, declared recently: "What we're trying to do is outline an entire strategy of becoming a Chinese company."

Cisco is establishing a new R&D center in Shanghai. The US corporation manufactures $5 billion of products in China where it employes 10,000 people.

That is just one company, and there are many doing the same thing. The result is abandonment of the American work force by American corporations. Little wonder the Bush administration is the first administration in 70 years to have a net loss of private sector jobs.

If one US company or a few move offshore, their profits improve and consumer prices are lower. However, when work in general moves offshore, American lose the incomes associated with the production of the goods they consume. Domestic production is turned into imports, with the result that America draws down its accumulated wealth in order to pay for the imports on which it is dependent.

The dollar's value and status as reserve currency cannot forever stand the trade and budget deficits that are now part and parcel of America's economic policy.

Unless there are major changes soon, America's economic future is a third world work force with a banana democracy's worthless currency.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at: pcroberts@postmark.net

2 comments:

Isaac Carmichael said...

Worst President Ever!
What with the questioning of everyone's patriotism being so in vouge these days, why are no conservatives questioing the patriotism of those companies who abandon our country, taking their jobs and technologies with them?
I am not fundamentally opposed to improving the economies of developing countries; in fact, I believe it is really the only way to get any meaningful results in the so-called "war on terror". But it seems to me that our nation's most well-off, not our nations most vulnerable, should bear the majority of those sacrifices that must be made to help the other countires.

theKiel said...

You know, it's funny. I only came to this blog on accident after regretfully clicking "Next Blog". In regards to "Bob's" comments about patriotism, why would you be in support of this liberal/socialist who is so against our president? Bush is our president whether you like it or not - you don't have to agree with him, but you should support him. Making comments about lost jobs during his "reign" is not a side effect of Bush becoming president. Bush did not cause those jobs to go missing, the government did. You mention a rise in employment of non-tradeable services. Money is money dude. When disposable income increases, the companies who have been suffering report greater and greater increases in GDP/RGDP and thus generate an increase in jobs. Typically, decreases in unemployment begin with a rise in service industries. Those "large drop" positions you mentioned are all interrelated to the computer electronics industry and those decrease were long forecasted as so many people were seeking degree and therefore jobs in those fields. How has the US taken on a third world work force? Is it because American's are too damn lazy to put in a solid 8 hour day? Go to any retail establishment [The Home Depot, Lowe's, CompUSA, BestBuy, etc] and ask around how long people have been working for that company, and then ask who their CEO is. Bottom line, people are dedicated and aren't willing to put in the work to get the raises to make the money they want. We have become and very impatient, greedy, and spoiled nation. And not because of any presidential decree. The Bush economy has lost 2.8 million jobs in manufacturing or 2.8 million jobs have been forfeited by manufacturing companies? Outsourced jobs are not going to be replaced and based on the state of those people who would fill those positions shouldn't. It's a radical statement, by I wouldn't spend a dime in this country if I'm going to risk the future of my company to employees who chronically commit clock fraud, petty lawsuits, special interest groups, traveling ADA activists, or the like. So with that said, can we blame Cisco? Would you agree that the power of the employers is being taken out of their hands and put at the will of special interest groups? Finally, I'm going to have to be crude and say fuck you for saying the following: "Unless there are major changes soon, America's economic future is a third world work force with a banana democracy's worthless currency." If that's your point of view, you truly are on the verge of socialism and I truly pity little people like yourself. I understand that the Blogger was not the writer of this column, but by reprinting it, you're just as bad if not worse. If you would like to justify Kaiser Roberts' statements, please email me: OrnyFocker@gmail.com or post a comment to my blog at Orny-Focker.blogspot.com.